Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Debt, Wealth and the Great Recession


Debt, Wealth, and the Great Recession

March 2011


Understanding the American Economy
Over the past 15 years, an underlying story is the role of credit
GFC has thrust debt squarely into the consciousness of economists
Likely to be integral to the future course of the economy
Supply and Demand for credit in the Big 3: Households, Businesses and Government
Conventional wisdom provides good framework for supply effects
Proper diagnosis of credit-crunch
Fails to account for demand-side deleveraging shocks and debt-overhang
Implications on policy chosen, successes and failures



The Game Plan
1.   Theoretical consideration of credit and wealth

2.   Recent role of debt in American economy

3.   Japanese comparison

4.   Policy implications and future prospects






Credit in the Economy- Supply
How can borrowing and lending play a driving force in the real economy?
-Fed Reserve Chair Bernanke among foremost economist on topic
Banks monitoring costs are inverse to borrowers collateral- more wealth people have, the more bank is willing to lend- falling bank-loan rates spur investment, accelerating original increase in output
“Credit Channel Accelerator”
-Crisis can increase bank-loan rates, reducing credit in the economy, lowering output and pushing down nominal interest rates (more later)


Bank Lending Channel
Health of banks also a clear factor in lending rates, supply of credit
Eg. Size of collateral, balance-sheet, lines of credit, liquidity, all impact how easily they can raise money themselves, willingness to lend- resulting feedback effects
Implies the effects of monetary policy have larger effects on real economy than accounted for
Bank Reserve ratios, money supply, powerful tools over banking system used by policy makers in “Great Moderation” (1990-2007) to “stabilize” economy 


Credit Demand
Framework predicts increased credit demand bids up bank rate, reducing nominal rate and overall demand
-- However fails to capture nature of how balance-sheet problems can change sensitivity of loan demand to interest rates
Deleveraging shock? Can fall in debt limit force distress-selling/default that leaves debt-overhang?
-- Excess money can get stuck in banking system without willing borrowers, as people either paying back loans, or defaulting on them
Rare, but there have been episodes of falling debt despite available credit- Great Depression, Japan’s Lost Decade


The Wealth Effect
Increasing/Decreasing housing wealth is a key factor for growth in consumption/investment
Evidence from past cycle indicates supply was prime driver during run-up- related to massive increase in lending to previously unqualified borrowers
Demand AND supply falling during recession
1-2 Punch

Some Historical Context
Corporate Debt (Blue) and Household Debt (Red) as % GDP















Clearly there is a story to tell here!



Entering the decade…
1990’s, early 2000’s a story of corporate the corporate balance sheet
Tech boom and relatively low interest rates spur corporate investment, borrowing
Once the cycle ends, investment/borrowing growth decreases rapidly
Over the course of ’00-01 recession Fed cuts rate to 1% lasting 3 years


Equipment/Software Investment as % GDP vs Fed Funds Rate

2001 recession/aftermath a foreshadow of things to come
Fall in corporate borrowing (-10%GDP) related to supply or demand for credit?
Supply: relatively minor blip in lending mkts, bank surveys indicate tightening standards
Demand: Interest rates still historically very low, companies with good credit ratings not increasing investment, strong growth in cash flow
Fed Chief Alan Greenspan, so-called expert on credit-supply surprised by “Debt-rejection syndrome”
Issue is Demand! Companies focused on repairing balance-sheets despite low interest rates
Debt-overhang helps explains relatively slow recovery from 2002-04


Who steps in? Households
Late 90’s, emergence of hhld credit boom- Debt/Income ratio rises from 2.2 to 3 from ‘02-’06, add $6trillion in debt
Supply factors drive buble: low rates, foreign savings-glut, securitization/financial innovation, gov policy, etc
Rise of credit inextricably linked to booming house prices, residential investment
Credit primarily increasing going to ppl with falling incomes, (first time ever)
Mortgage refinancing and expected rising prices help continue bubble

Great Recession Pt. 1 07-08: Falling Demand
-House prices peak in ‘06, debt-growth slows
-Foreclosures start rising, prices/residential investment/durable consumption start falling only in indebted (bubble) regions
-Feedback loop breaks down- wealth effect from falling assets causes people to reach debt-limit, defaults begin- people just tapped out!
Local credit supply constraints? Unlikely, falling credit irrespective of whether
Only focused on credit-supply, Fed reserve sits on its hands as default problem grows
Survey results indicate falling demand for loans before supply
Non-leveraged regions/ businesses not pulling back yet
“The fundamentals of our economy are strong”- John McCain
“As long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing.”- Chuck Prince (CEO Citi Group)

Hhld Liabilities/GDP (Red) vs Real House Prices (Blue)
















Change in Hhld Liabilities/GDP (Red) vs Change in Real House Prices (Blue)


Household Wealth as % GDP


Crash in housing bring along drop in wealth of approx 1 year’s GDP ($13 trillion)


Great Recession Pt. 2 (08Q3-09): Credit Crunch
Amid the rise of hhld credit the financial system takes on considerable debt
As asset prices began falling, the illiquidity and opaque nature of securities create distress selling, asset prices and stock markets spiraling downward, job losses
Bank rates rise, nominal rates fall- consistent with conventional wisdom
Sept ‘08 Lehman Shock, and freezing of the short-term paper market
Without short term borrowing companies literally would have no cash to pay their workers next paycheck!


1-2 Punch: Falling Supply AND Demand for Credit
Bank Survey Respondents:
% of banks tightening standards for consumer (blue), business (green) loans
% of banks reporting higher demand for consumer (red), business (orange) loans













-Notice low orange-line in early 2000’s- Corporate -Debt Rejection
-Red-line begins falling steadily in 06’, reaches lowest point during worst of recession
-Blue-line rises later in ’07 (credit crunch)
-Demand indicators have only returned to 0% (eg no more falling demand) despite over 3 years at very low interest rates
-Shows Debt-overhang, people paying off debt or defaulting!


Rescue efforts
Blind-sided by the crash, authorities spring into action
-Fed Gov: Takes on the debt, primarily from falling tax revenue
TARP, Bank Bailouts     
700Bn stimulus in early ‘09
Federal Reserve follow their textbooks: Save credit supply!
Lower funds rate to 0%, pumping money into banks
Launch Quantitative Easing- massive expansion of money supply, buys bank assets, all to lower long-term rates/prevent deflation, stimulate credit
Approach follows their theoretical disproportionate focus on credit supply: explains slow response to default problems but aggressive towards banking crisis. Shows in successes and failures of policy

Aftermath
Recession officially ends in summer ‘09
-Unemployment, house prices finally reach a plateau, stock-market rebounds
Interest rates remain low despite increasing government deficit
“L-shaped” recovery consistent with financial crises
-Recent data shows slow improvements

GDP (Red) vs Long-run GDP Trend (Blue)
 














Going Forward:
Household Balance-Sheets are still struggling, concentrated in high-leverage regions
 














Debt-overhang, high unemployment concentrated in bubble States (eg Florida, Nevada)


Liquidity Trap: Broken Banks or Balance-Sheets?
-Historical there is link btw growth of Base Money (Red- amount of bills floating around), Credit (Green- eg amount of hhld debt) and the Money Supply (Blue- amount of money flowing btw all goods, financial, and credit mkts)



-Rise in Red-line (bills floating around) represents Federal Reserve money injection
-However its clear link btw Base Money and Credit is broken
-Where is this extra money? Sitting in some bank vault!
- Credit supply issue? Unclear, could be banks are unwilling to lend, maybe they are bankrupt?
-Concentration of debt-overhang indicates its likely a demand problem- households on average are paying back their debt or defaulting on mortgages! No desire to borrow despite available credit
         -Housing prices haven’t started recovering

        
Precedents? 1990’s Japan


















(OECD)


Corporations went on epic binge in late 80’s with associated rise in land prices
Crash in ‘91 sees deceleration of  growth and credit ala Great Recession pt 1., full out deleveraging by ‘95 despite falling bank-lending rates

By 1997 banking problems emerge causing credit crunch
Still, demand issues override:
Monetary actions, bank injections have no effect
Like US, divergence btw growth in base money and credit- funds are stuck in banking system
Survey’s indicate company’s not finding it difficult to find loans- to busy paying off debt
Were internal banks the problem, should have been great chance for foreign banks yet few succeed


Comparisons between Japan and US
American response to credit tightening, insolvency, has been much more aggressive, relatively stronger bank-lending channel
Eg bounce-back in US stock prices vs 20 year decline in Japan
Japanese loss in wealth worse than US
Base money has lost influence on growth of credit, which drives money supply
Falling money supply can cause deflationary spiral and rapid econ contraction
eg US Great Depression ‘29-33: Lending= -47%, Money Supply= -33%, GDP= -50%
In both examples MS never actually decreases, despite falling private sector credit. Why?



Implications for Fiscal Policy
-Government borrowing at start of both recessions supported M2 growth
To date, low interest rates indicate private sector credit demand not being crowded out higher deficit
Serious implications for deficit reduction if private sector credit unable to drive M2 growth
Both ‘97 and ‘01 Japanese attempts at austerity seriously weaken economy undermining deficit reduction itself- policies forced to be reversed
US 1937 deficit reduction shows similar effects
Did the UK cut too early in summer 2010?
Important to separate current downturn deficit from larger-scale long-run aging-population related deficits
Will cutting now matter in 2040?
Who knows how long before deficit noticeably undermines economy


Implications for Monetary Policy
Raising nominal rates would likely increase debt-burden on deleveraging households
However wild swings in base money without results display limitations of monetary policy
Excess reserves could drive future credit bubble if remaining by time loan-demand resumes/banking issues are resolved
Further QE likely less important for Fed’s role in helping sustain recovery than ensuring functioning banking system, lending channel
Must learn from mistakes and consider credit demand, pursue rescue policy options that can help everyday people


Future Prospects
Deficit reduction requires private sector recovery
Where is there room to Grow?
Business sector: indications of increasing optimism
Relatively healthy balance sheets/cash-flow
Can actually drive productive investment (eg computers) rather than residential investment (eg hot-tubs!)
Exports: growth in developing world provides larger customer-base, aided by depreciating dollar
Household’s role contingent on recovery in housing, credit
Slow recovery, things stopped getting worse- high leveraged regions with debt overhang
Clear that balance sheet of each sector will play a major role in future of the American Economy!





The End